This spat between
the Executive Branch of Philippine Government, opposed to the Chief Justice, with the engagement of the House of Representatives, is delightful. Really good
television, excellent for newspaper sales. It is juicy. It stars people we
know. It is knock down drag out. People are seriously bent out of shape. It
doesn't get much better than this.
Now various
organizations are choosing side, backing the judiciary or the President,
uttering their punditry. Anger and indignation are ripe across the land.
One offical, whose
name skipped past me in yesterday's flood of information on the subject, said,
essentially, "This is democracy at work".
Bingo, Brother.
Indeed, democracy is not the three separate branches of Government. Democracy
is what they do. The laws they pass, the leadership they provide, the arguments
they have.
Democracy is a verb,
an action. Not an entity. It is not the President. He is a small player on a
big stage. It is not the Senate, they are just a bunch of generally fat old
well-to-do people from good families seeking to be profound. It is not the
highest judges in the land, they are ponderous, professorial people who do
their business on a toilet like the rest of us. It is not the House, which is a
rabble of popular red-nosed clowns in search of a wildly cheering tent; a
former dictator's wife, the son of a former President, a superstar boxer, and a
bunch of names that are the same as the streets in Manila. The old people in
the House are generally thinner than in the Senate.
My two favorite
verbologists are Senator Santiago and Justice Secretary de Lima. Are they
sisters, or what?
I like them because
they can coin a phrase, and because their thinking usually is profound. It
means something. It makes sense. It is refreshing.
Secretary
de Lima is being roasted by many for her characterization of Cheap* Justice
Corona (* blatantly
plagarized from MR) as "a walking
constitutional violation". Rather than roasting her, they ought to cheer
her. Where else do you get the truth unvarnished, as eloquently put as a
nuclear poem.
I've held Senator
Santiago in high regard since she declined to join President Arroyo's expensive
New York bash, and later characterized it as probably not the best way to spend
taxpayer money. True, she did get a tad hysterical in describing the American
VFA as a "humiliation, a humiliation!", but she made up for it by
chastising the priests who bummed free cars off a government agency.
President Aquino is
starting to gain my admiration, too, as being a Man of his own, rather than a
puppet for others to yank. His decisions are big-time. Blocking the Arroyos
from fleeing the country. Giving the nod to impeachment of the Cheap Justice.
Building up a military capability to defend Philippine interests in the West
Philippine sea. (I project that American ships will be back a Subic in five
years, a smaller force than before, but a nice kick in the pants for the Subic retail trade. Or panties, as the case may
be.) His democratic actions are decisive and clear. He just needs to get in
the face of the Catholic Church, those pompous robed superiors who never accept
responsibility for anything.
The Philippines is
acting as a big democratic boy now. It is out in public, in our faces, in plain
sight. Not behind the scenes or stabbing in the back with armies and coups and
overthrow of the Constitution in the dead of night. It's at the microphone, in
the camera, in print black and white, all spokespersons blazing.
This is democracy at
its finest.
Joe,
ReplyDeleteAs Europe and other Western Economies crumble, the world shall witness the rise of a new economic and military superpower: The Philippines.
Historians will write about Noynoy as a great leader and visionary. He is like a Winston Churchill and FDR rolled into one.
Joe,
ReplyDeleteA lot of Filipinos believe that there is no debate. The Chief Justice and all who oppose the current President, should go by any means, and that's that.
IF the senate fails to impeach the Chief Justice, I'll bet you a jar of Tuna that we'll see another Edsa riot.
The problem I see with these so called "debates" in the Philippines, is they're always geared towards personalities and never the issues.
ReplyDeleteThis article of yours talk more sense than those of benign0's (his articles are composed of half-truths and ad hominem attacks).
ReplyDeleteIn fairness to Aquino, at least he is actually DOING something. Unlike many pseudo-intellectuals out there...just plain WHINERS.
Anon1, No bet. That is interesting to suppose that President Aquino has that much support.
ReplyDeleteAnon2, indeed, the inability to distinguish personality from issue is astounding, whether it be in Congress or on Get Real Post. I suspect it has something to do with hyper-sensitivity and loss of face.
Anon3, Nice of you to visit. Benigno has an agenda, so that undermines his objectivity regarding President Aquino. Some are likely to find my approach also lacking if the subject is one of my pet peeves, like the Catholic Church having so much influence while bearing absolutely no responsibility for outcomes. I personally see Benigno as a brilliant man who relentlessly limits what he could offer to others, if he were objective.
Benign0 sure has an agenda - it's just not as noble as he claims. Like any other troll, he only wants to be noticed. He's probably a nobody in real life - unemployed and living off welfare.
ReplyDeleteTo further understand why benign0 is behaving the way he does, please read:
http://www.flayme.com/troll/angler.shtml
Anon. Great article. Thanks for the link.
ReplyDeleteNewt Gingrich weigh in on Philippines cat fight ... :)
ReplyDelete"If the Congress and the court say the president is wrong, in the end the president would lose. And if the president and the court agreed, the Congress loses," said Gingrich. "The founding fathers designed the Constitution very specifically in a Montesquieu spirit of the laws to have a balance of power - not to have a dictatorship by any one of the three branches."
@Mariano: The balance of power among the three branches of government is a result of the concept of checks and balances. While benign0 and his clique are shouting themselves hoarse about the separation of powers, what they don't tell their readers is that the separation of powers between the three branches of government is not absolute. Each of these branches have a certain degree of power over the other two. In the same way, each of these branches are subservient to the other two. This dynamic prevents any of the three branches from becoming too powerful.
ReplyDeleteP.S. Presidential appointments and impeachment are concrete examples of the aforementioned concept of checks and balances.