But his is a
break-out from the old tradition of public service for private gain. His
cabinet is stocked with capable secretaries who also pursue his aim for a
cleaner, more productive government.
![]() |
The past, not the future? |
Mr. Aquino's
presidency illustrates the point that the fates sometimes have more to do with
how things turn out than do manmade plans.
There are no
guarantees for any presidential candidate. A president can be highly capable
and have on his hands a war that kills hundreds and hundreds of thousands of citizens (Lincoln; American Civil War).
Or he can be asleep a lot of the time and oversee economic revitalization and
defeat of a nation (Reagan; Russia).
It raises the
interesting question, can we shape the fates to our favor?
When we vote for a
candidate, we know maybe 25% of what we could or should know about him or her.
So 75% is guess or unknown. And beyond that is the unpredictability of natural
disasters and bully nations and the global economy and political gangs within
the Philippines (NPA) that shape the landscape. I'm convinced Gilbert Teodoro
was marked down as a presidential candidate in 2009 because he lost the rubber
boats that were needed when Ondoy struck.
Undone by a typhoon.
Fate.
JoeAm's perspective
on the Philippine presidency is shaped by a very broad idea that continuation
of the Aquino breakout requires a president who is not motivated by the
"old values" of personal gain, but the "new values" of
honorable service and result.
Old dogs. They don't
learn new tricks easily.
I see the
productivity of young Sonny Angara in the house and I say "here is a young
guy more interested in his future than immediate wealth." And I like it.
In an environment that prizes honest behavior, the winners will be those who
shoot straight rather than behave crooked. Those who do not gum the system up
with favor and self-enrichment. Their enrichment will come from personal
achievement. The money will follow that, naturally and cleanly.
So I like young
Filipino politicians. They have not been turned into peddlers of favor over
public interest.
Is it age bias? Is
it bias to believe that old age traps us in inflexibility, and narrows us?
Makes us more conservative? Reduces our energy. Makes us wiser but slows our
problem solving? Gives us cultural values that are hard to shake?
Or is it perceptive?
Real. Factual. Or at least "strategic" considering the dynamics of
what it means to project a Philippines "going straight."
President Aquino,
before he became president, lived a leisurely lifestyle, rich and connected
with the movers and shakers of the Philippines. Including the Church. But he
had no striking ambitions. Not to rule. Not to get rich. He probably would have
been happy to find a wife and have kids and drive the expressways in a Porsche,
a quiet man living a quiet life.
That changed in
2009. Now he has better things to do, and he will have them to do for three
more years. He has grown in maturity during his three years at the helm. He
projects more confidence. He's more relaxed. He is firmer in his views.
President Aquino was
born in 1960. He was 50 when he took office in 2010. He has the vigor of a man
in the prime of his life. He is no recalcitrant old fossil unable to deal with
the stresses of an important job, locked into values that hold the Philippines
back.
What about some of
the people listed in various categories on JoeAm's preview of the 2016
presidential election? How old will they be in 2016?
PROSPECT
|
DOB
|
AGE
|
Bam Bam Aquino
|
1977
|
39
|
Sonny Angara
|
1972
|
44
|
Jun Abaya
|
1966
|
50
|
Atty Alex Lacson
|
1965
|
51
|
Gilbert Teodoro
|
1964
|
52
|
Grace Padaca
|
1963
|
53
|
Kim Henares
|
1960
|
56
|
Mar Roxas
|
1957
|
59
|
Sergio
OsmeƱa III
|
1943
|
73
|
Jejomar Binay
|
1942
|
74
|
Conchita Carpio
Morales
|
1941
|
75
|
Ramon
"Jun" Magsaysay
|
1938
|
78
|
Does it matter? Can
a 39 year-old be wise enough, schooled enough to handle the presidency? Maybe
not. Maybe he has simply not been tested enough. Has not had enough time to
show what he can do.
And How about a 78
year-old? Will he have the energy and health and alertness to manage a nation
that presents huge challenges? Maybe not. Maybe that is at the outer edge. Mr.
Magsaysay would be 84 upon leaving office.
John Kennedy was 43
when he became president of the United States. Barak Obama was 48. Their
youthful vigor undoubtedly contributed to their attractiveness as leaders. The
presidency makes you old. The long hours, the stresses, the relentless reading
to study up on issues. Do before and after photos of American presidents and
you can see the toll they pay.
Vigor. Youthful
vigor. It's a job qualification, I think.
But there are other
advantages to having a young president than simply energy. There is the
marketing advantage, the "presentation" of the nation to a world that
has long looked at the Philippines as a hamstrung disappointment, an
underachiever locked into the dysfunction of strife and inefficiency.
Today, for this time
in history, the Philippines needs to project its youth to the outer world. It's
vibrancy, its new blood, its vigor, its brains.
It needs to make a
statement. We are the future. Here now. Fresh. Clean. Young. Ambitious.
No longer tied to
the past. No longer muddled in confusion and coups and corruption.
It continues the
breakout for honest values, purposeful work and achievement. Begun by Noynoy
Aquino, carried forward by the young, the capable, the intelligent and the
good.
That's why you will
find that JoeAm assigns an advantage to youth as he works to identify First
Class presidential prospects.
photosources: gulfnews